A guy at work retired and a "good newer" test cell opened up and my boss offered me a newer test cell to work in. I was really happy about it but after being there a few days the amount of neglect this test cell has received over the last 18 years is pretty bad. Im going to be very busy and irritated fixing up the test cell. This is a small example of something so simple to do that no planning or effort was taken.
There isnt any reason for this we arent working on book time. The bad thing is we cant fix some of this while running so ill have to do it little by little over time. I need to take pictures of this stuff and give it to my boss when it comes to yearly review time so he can see the impact a person can make ina test cell. I get shit from people for taking marginally longer on jobs than others and after seeing this mess now i know why i take longer.
Comments
Fighting that battle now. Multiple same equipment failures, results in huge manufacturing downtime causing missed customer deliveries. Why? because they would not PM & test the equipment. Why? because it requires downtime to PM & test which could potentially cause missed customer deliveries.
Will there be another failure? Yes. When? We cannot predict without PM & testing...OK lets run like this...
Our CEO went on a fun-filled "lean and mean" tour several months ago. He came back with "autonomous" and "predictive" buzzwords vis-a-vis our maintenance program. He has expressed some frustrations that we are not at that stage yet. You can about imagine, I am sure.
I am slowly moving my department forward along those lines, but we have an absolute wildcard on our equipment that is proving to make predictive maintenance programs elusive. Well, one wildcard and one serious limitation.
The wildcard is we are an USDA facility with a very paranoid washdown process. I have found water in Nema4X and IP67+ enclosures, for example. Plus, a lot of our equipment is simply not intended to be washed down under any circumstances. So, the chemical and water has resulted in a lot of failures - especially seriously annoying electrical failures. Ugh. On the positive side, my preventative maintenance program is essentially rendered moot as we destroy equipment faster than we wear it out. Our equipment is constantly having new bearings installed, new motors, etc. Expensive, but - I do not have to schedule downtime to swap out a few bearings, it is inherent to our washdown process.
Due to the above, we lack any actual historical data from which to draw predictive maintenance tasks. Explaining this to a salesman turned CEO is difficult - especially when every fucking lean expert pretends every facility is a picture perfect Toyota plant. When they are selling their system, they ignore plants that have failed at lean or that have had only very moderate success or write them off as "not trying hard enough". Lean worked extremely well in the electronics plant (and I enjoyed it, usually) - I am not seeing much evidence of it working at a high level in this plant. Food is competitive and marginal profits prevail - so it should be the poster boy for lean systems. Alas.
Lean works for manufacturing along with theory of constraints. This helps our manufacturing to set priorities and establish critical equipment. Our maintenance plans use the priorities and critical equipment within the frame work of our quality policy (plan, do check, act) to evaluate risks (yearly) and set plans to abate the risks.
While it sounds complicated, it's quite freeing. Only critical or high risk items get a PM, everything else is run to failure. We don't measure everything only the critical items that impact manufacturing are measured.
After re-reading this I should probably delete it, I come here to get away from work...
Once these things are turned on they are live and must be operational 24/7, so it's very important for every wire to be clearly labelled and match the drawing set, so that it can be serviced easily without shutting anything down.
Panduit covers are still off on this one as it was incomplete when the photo was taken.