Please review the site Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy at your convenience. Rules, TOS, Privacy
Get familiar with the reaction system: Introducing the Reaction System

Enclosure Tuning - Measurements Make No Sense

2»

Comments

  • I've yet to get any answers about this, but here again the port peak and driver valley don't line up. You'd think they would.

    rjj45
  • I'm not sure that aligning at the same frequency is a given.

     John H, btw forum has decided I don't get emails
  • edited October 24

    deleted

  • @jhollander said:
    I'm not sure that aligning at the same frequency is a given.

    But I'd assume it would, but I'm finding out, it doesn't. No one's explained why they don't, it's the tuning frequency, they should corespond, no?

  • Way long ago, I assumed that they would line up, but then found the same difference noted above when I measured the port and woofer nearfield.

    6thplanetAnalogkid455
    But Chahly - Stahkist don't want speakers that look good, Stahkist wants speakers that sound good!
  • edited October 24

    I still don't know the why either. I just know they don't.

    6thplanetAnalogkid455
  • It might have something to do with motor strength. In a TL the tuning freq. on low Q woofers should be slightly above resonance. and just the opposite for woofers with weak motors. It would make for a fun experiment. Slip, I think they call it slip.

    BilletSteve_Lee
  • maybe not

  • Maybe probably not

  • edited October 30

    You have the right idea. Rotary electric motors have slip, that is where they turn slower than the frequency that they are supplied with. A 4 pole motor should turn 1800 RPM at 60 Hz in theory, but are always somewhat slower. A typical AC motor might be rated around 1740 to 1750 RPM at 60 Hz. Rotary motor slip probably also depends on the strength of the magnetic field. I have never heard it called slip in audio, but I think it may be the same concept.

    jr@macSteve_LeeEggguy
  • edited October 31

    Only thing I can come up with trying to think things through is the dip in cone movement could indicate the point in the port output where the "linear" portion of the upward slope stops and starts to nose off. Sounds like calculus stuff.. man I hated calculus.

  • My understanding is that port output relative to cone motion peaks at Fb but since cone motion increases rapidly below Fb the ports peak output will be a bit below Fb. I don't remember where I read that though.

    Billet6thplanetEggguySteve_Lee
Sign In or Register to comment.