I put a cap in series before a super tweeter to roll off the response and took measurements. It's a 4.7 if cap. So when I load into PCD, do I need to enter the cap anywhere. If not then in the final circuit where do I keep this cap?
When I use a cap for "protection" while testing, I don't include it. Now, if it changes the effective FR I have to include it in the final measurement. Your cap has approx 4k hz filter, at 8ohms. Does this effect the FR to make a noticeable change?
I put a cap in series before a super tweeter to roll off the response and took measurements. It's a 4.7 if cap. So when I load into PCD, do I need to enter the cap anywhere. If not then in the final circuit where do I keep this cap?
No. The cap.is already accounted for in tge measurement itself. It woukd be like adding another 4.7 cap to the response.
Whats the target XO? 4.7 may be a little too small.... make sure its roll off occurs at least one octave below the desired xo point.
Planning to come around 7 or 8k. The mid is fr88ex. How do I know if the fr is changing or not? There doesn't seem to be much difference from the published FR and with the cap. There is a sharp knee and roll off at around 2k.
I am measuring for coming. Due to the low sensitivity of the woofer I have to measure everything at a pretty high level hence the cap. Don't mind the cap being part of the XO, but not sure how to account for it or where to add to the actual XO circuit, even if I don't include it in PCD.
you are right, loosely based on the W5, but sealed to stay within the guidelines and I didn't like the wonky bass response at 2.5 L with a 5 inch port. And the tweeter is in the front.
Comments
Whats the target XO? 4.7 may be a little too small.... make sure its roll off occurs at least one octave below the desired xo point.
That 4.7 is just fine then! Whatcha puttin together?