Please review the site Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy at your convenience. Rules, TOS, Privacy
Get familiar with the reaction system: Introducing the Reaction System

Now for something nice - and a little retro.

2»

Comments

  • edited March 21

    @jr@mac said:
    Might have my work cut out for me on the woofer side of things.

    That tweeter 's response looks really nice to work with.

  • So, expensive ass crossover simulation here:

    Might wire this up and see what's going on with it. Lucky for me I have a pile of 50uF poly caps.

    Tom_SWolf4thtry6thplanetGowa
    I have a signature.
  • XSim is fucking up picture files these days, not sure what is going on there. Oh well.

    I have a signature.
  • I just use the MS snipping tool.
    I'm surprised C4 has to be that large, but if it's for phase alignment only... shrug I woulda bet half that by gut reaction.

    Turn2
  • @Wolf said:
    I just use the MS snipping tool.
    I'm surprised C4 has to be that large, but if it's for phase alignment only... shrug I woulda bet half that by gut reaction.

    Nope.

    I have a signature.
  • edited March 22

    I remember having a similar sim with this very same tweeter YEARS ago and Wolf told me the same thing back then. A 25uF exists in that very spot today. I'm not gonna pretend I was ever a xo savant then or now, but the eerie similarity was just worth noting.

    6thplanetWolf
  • My RUsher II design (Wow, that was almost 14 years ago) which used these same two drivers had a 47 uF cap where JR has the 50 uF. I don't remember specifically why.

  • Of course a smaller cap would work, but not as well. Not my first rodeo.

    PWRRYD
    I have a signature.
  • Seanscoil - old Irish for "Old School". Pronounced like "Sean's skull", or close enough to that.

    PWRRYDkenrhodes
    I have a signature.
  • Here is a smaller (33uF) capacitor version. I like it. Had to change a few other things to get it to smooth out in the XO region.

    I'll see if I can wire this up today yet.

    tommytunes50Turn2Wolfugly_wooferAnalogkid455
    I have a signature.
  • So after an extensive measuring and tweaking session, I have arrived at this:

    Still have not listened yet, but it is similar to other speakers that I really enjoy. Went from 3rd electrical on both to 2nd electrical on both, so saving some coin along the way. Not that it matters, I have all this shit in stock lol.

    hifisideugly_wooferSteve_Lee6thplanetImpiousScottSAnalogkid455
    I have a signature.
  • Upon listening to the above combo, I am pretty happy with the direction these are going.

    I have a signature.

  • For what it is worth. Distortion is SPL accurate at 30". Woofer and port nearfield. I don't usually post those measurements.

    Wolf4thtryhifisideSteve_LeePWRRYDAnalogkid455
    I have a signature.
  • Great project! I hope you bring them to Iowa this Fall.

    jr@mac
  • @PWRRYD said:
    Great project! I hope you bring them to Iowa this Fall.

    See what I can do.

    I have a signature.
  • So I spent a lot of time yesterday listening to a few different iterations.
    I'll probably solder things up this week sometime, after my ears reset and I have another session or two that is.

    ugly_wooferSteve_Lee6thplanetAnalogkid455
    I have a signature.
  • Reminds me of the pair I built in the 90s but with the SS 18w8545k and the SS 9300 tweeter. They were pretty awesome.

    jr@mac
  • 6thplanetSteve_Lee
    I have a signature.
  • Some consistency issues, so one channel will be a little warmer than the other I guess. Not really a dealbreaker, so it is what it is.

    6thplanetSteve_Lee
    I have a signature.
  • tajanesEggguysilverDhifiside6thplanetWolfSteve_Leejohnny5jzMartyHTurn2and 2 others.
    I have a signature.
  • These Usher woofers are pretty nice.
    Even with one channel being a little less sensitive the imaging is pretty solid. I just shift my ass a little to one side. Thought about tearing into them and doing custom padding but just not worth it IMHO.

    Damn shame Usher told DIY to go to hell.

    6thplanet
    I have a signature.
  • Those would be cool in a tower format. Nice work, JR🤘🏼

    jr@mac
  • Shout out to a couple forum members who made this possible with their helluva good deals on the drivers.

    Now, the fun part... I might re-do these but with some changes to the cabinet design. I probably won't, but it would be fun to do something with facets or large round overs.

    6thplanetPWRRYDtommytunes50Steve_Lee
    I have a signature.
  • Crossover I ended up with:

    Final impedance:

    tajanesSteve_LeejhollanderPWRRYD
    I have a signature.
  • edited March 29

    Bass is really opening up on these. They have such a loosey-goosey suspension I didn't think they would need much of a burn-in, but it is obvious they are changing, and for the better. The bass out of these is clean!

    FWIW the impedance dropping below 4 ohms should not be a problem for any amp. The Dayton APA 150 drive it just fine, and if that cheapass amp can do it, pretty much any amp can. The phase is only about +5 degrees there anyways, so a fairly benign load. The Dreadnaught has no issues driving them louder than I normally listen.

    I really like how these turned out, and depending on what I end up doing this summer should make an appearance at Iowa.

    Tom_SPWRRYDugly_woofer4thtrySteve_LeeTurn2
    I have a signature.
  • Those 8945A woofers never cease to amaze me. Incredible great bass and super clean midrange! I hope you bring them to Ankeny.

  • @PWRRYD said:
    Those 8945A woofers never cease to amaze me. Incredible great bass and super clean midrange! I hope you bring them to Ankeny.

    They should be there.

    Tom_S
    I have a signature.
  • Rotated in to the Nerdery.

    Turn2Steve_Lee
    I have a signature.
  • God these cabinets are ugly, I may have to do some body work and get them coated with something.

    6thplanetugly_woofer
    I have a signature.
Sign In or Register to comment.