Just thought I'd drop a line here and let you guys know that I am testing speakers/drivers and posting on my site. I used to post to my old site but the server died and I had a lot of family stuff going on at the time so just never bothered to worry about it. Decided to move everything over to a new spot and will hopefully start testing again soon once I see what the quote from Klippel is going to be.
I just ported over 3 reviews from the old site:
Scanspeak 12m Midrange
HAT L1-Pro R2 Ring Radiator Tweeter
Tectonics 2" BMR Speaker
Links below. Enjoy!
https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/driveunits/scanspeak-revelator-12m-4631-g00_4.5_midrange/https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/driveunits/hybrid-audio-l1-pro-r2-ring-radiator-tweeters/https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/driveunits/tectonic-elements-tebm35c10-4-miniature-bmr-driver/
Comments
I've also asked about an automated turntable; I built one myself but if there's some way to automate turning the speaker that will interface with their software module(s) it then that improves not only time but also accuracy. I'm trying to make as much of this as automated as possible because, no joke, it took me about 8 hours to do a review on a driver last time from the set-up (including cutting baffles which always was a drain), taking photos, capturing the data, posting and then finally tear-down and store away of the test rig. I hate spending time away from my kiddo. That's why I'm writing some post-processing scripts to help with some of the heavy lifting. That's also why I'm planning on having her join me in some of my efforts. I've told her I'd give her $5 for every intro she composes on her piano for my videos.
Erin –
Thanks for the informative video. Back when you posted Klippel reviews over at diymobileaudio I felt you were a lone voice in the wilderness. It seemed most members were only obsessed with buying the next, more expensive upgrade and price was always equated with quality. When that website morphed into its current state I stopped visiting.
I fully enjoyed your medleysmusings website, especially the KEF coaxial tests. So I’m happy you have a new website. I also wish you the best with your Youtube and FB sites. I will have to admit that that I’m a dinosaur and prefer the forum and web based sites. I have a lot of philosophical problems with the FB platform so I stay away from it. But I guess that’s where a lot of people hang out. Welcome back.
I understand that many are anti-FB. And I'm not making content solely available there. Actually, the FB group was created just as a quick way for me to inform a lot of people there is new data on my site. It's the alternative to email blasting everyone.
I think the YT format will be better in some ways to highlight products. And other times a written review with photos is all I'll need. But I know that I have gotten various questions about my test setup and I know I am a fan of multiple youtube reviewers because they do a good job of presenting an item I'm interested in. So I'm just using the various methods at my disposal to yield the best quality review.
I agree.
I have some ideas for videos in the future. Just patiently waiting for the folks at Klippel to get back to me regarding costs of what I've asked about. After that then I can decide how I want/need to move forward.
Thanks for watching!
- Erin
Whoops. I should have put my question in this thread, sorry about that, copy & pasted here:
"Hi Erin,
I was reading the "Test Methods" section on your website and was wondering if you are using the same IEC test baffle as listed in the Legacy Review section? I am currently building a DIY IEC test baffle for my own use at home and was wondering what your thoughts are on the baffle size needed to get good measurements. Thanks. Bill"
Well, just to be clear, I haven't started testing again just yet. I'm still waiting to get a final quote. Klippel told me to give them a few weeks (they are going to have to wait to get everything together in order to give the final shipping quote).
As far as the size, that depends on a few things. How low you can (plan to) measure in terms of a reflection free window (i.e., how high you can gate) and if you plan on doing nearfield/farfield merging. My scaled down baffle was adequate for testing by combining the NF and FF measurements without having any issues show up. Between that and modeling with Edge or VirtuixCAD to determine the impacts of the baffle, I would say a true IEC baffle is unnecessary. I had that at one point very early on and see no need to do that again.
That said, one of my hair-brained ideas is to actually build a room in my attic for testing and in doing so, I will dedicate an entire wall for being the test baffle.
Thanks for the info. The size I am building is 1350 x 1650mm, which is roughly the scaled down size recommended for 8 inch woofers. I do not plan to build speakers using anything bigger than an 8 inch woofer. I will be raising the test baffle up on a stand which sits on top of my home brew horizontal polar table. This will place the mic and speaker at a height of roughly 55 inches above the floor. This will be in the middle of my living room or "great room" which has a sloped ceiling leading to a loft area. The nearest reflection will be about 6.5 feet from the mic tip and speaker in all directions, except the floor, which will be closer (55" ). I generally set my gate at 5ms.
I will not be merging NF and FF data. When I build and test a speaker cabinet, I will be doing all my design work using FF data only. I want to include the floor boundary reinforcement effect in my measurements, which varies quite a bit with woofer height. If I apply smoothing to the bouncing data curve below 400Hz and then merge this back onto the FF curve, I can get the amount of BSC to apply fairly close in XSim. I do not use Edge or VirtuixCAD to model the baffle, as the baffles I have been building lately are generally too complex in shape to fit the models.
I think your "hair-brained" idea is a good one. Go for it.
Also, thanks for the note about the Q100 testing I did. I actually had a few industry guys contact me privately and tell me they thought it was insightful and would likely implement similar testing on their own coaxial drivers. Pretty sweet!
If you don’t mind helping out, you can use the link below to contribute to via PayPal (they take 3%, I’m OK with that):
https://www.erinsaudiocorner.com/contribute/
FWIW, this is a list of everything I got:
1 DA2 - Distortion Analyzer 2
Item No.: 2000-002 processor unit for all modules (incl. cable set) Refurbished unit Revision 2.1
2 LPM - Linear Parameter Measurement
Item No.: 1000-400 identification of linear electrical and mechanical parameters
3 LSI Woofer + Box - Large Signal Identification Woofer + Box for DA2
Item No.: 1000-230 identification of linear, nonlinear and thermal parameters of woofer drivers in free air, sealed and vented enclosures
4 LSI Tweeter - Large Signal Identification Tweeter for DA2
Item No.: 1000-220 identification of linear, nonlinear and thermal parameters of tweeters, micro speakers, compression drivers in free air
5 TRF Pro - Transfer Function Measurement Professional
Item No.: 1000-910 measurement of transfer function, harmonic distortion and rub & buzz
6 DIS Pro - 3D Distortion Measurement Professional
Item No.: 1000-810 DIS features + measurement of HI2 and amplitude intermodulation distortion
7 TBM - Tone Burst Measurement
Item No.: 1001-109 peak SPL measurements using tone burst signals (CEA2010)
8 PWT Pro - Power Test Professional
Item No.: 1000-700 power testing with temperature measurement and transducer identification
9 Pro Driver Stand
Item No.: 2211-002 transducer fixture with laser and microphone positioning (incl. laser calibration spacer), Rev. 1.5
10 Laser Set ANR 1282
Item No.: 2102-010 +/- 20mm, for woofer + midrange (incl. Controller ANR 5132)
11 Mic 17 IEPE 1/4"
Item No.: 2400-103
12 Cable; BNC - BNC, 2m
Item No.: 2300-106 Microphone cable, BNC male to BNC male, 2m, low capacitance coaxial cable type, blue
13 Mic Holder; MK10, for 1/2" Mics, fixed
Item No.: 2400-206 fixed Mic Holder for 1/2" mics, made of plastic, 1/4" mounting thread
14 Manufacturer Calibration DA, PA, PM8
Item No.: 6000-001 DA, PM8 or PA calibration with formal certificate, recommended every 2 years
The one thing I'm excited to have is the Pro Test Stand. It has connection points for the mic and laser and will fit various size drive units.
Edit: This is used for getting T/S parameters and namely linear xmax. Not for Frequency Response related measurements. A baffle will be used for FR measurements of drive-units like I've always done.
And since I know I'll be asked at some point what this stuff costs, here's the price list.
https://www.klippel.de/fileadmin/klippel/Bilder/Our_Products/R-D_System/PDF/KLIPPEL_Analyzer_System_Price-List.pdf
Some of the things I purchased aren't on the price list as they have since been updated so you would have to get a quote. My contact at Klippel was able to locate me a couple used parts to help me pad my costs a little. I won't get in to my exact costs because, frankly, that's not information I want out on the internet. But, if you look at the sheet you can see the list price for some of the things above and that'll give you an idea of what I've invested.
I won't bump this again until I get some of the actual products in but figured I'd share this.
One of my car audio buddies also set up this GoFundMe page here which I thought was wicked cool of him to do so if you'd rather support that way than through PayPal here's the link:
https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-hardison-erin-hardison-that-is?utm_source=customer&utm_medium=copy_link-tip&utm_campaign=p_cp+share-sheet