On the way back from Iowa DIY 2017, I had a short discussion with Bryan about possibly changing up the format of future Iowa DIY events. Here are my thoughts, and I'd love feedback on it.
One of the issues I feel we face as a community is the ever increasing quality of drivers in the hobby. As they get better and better, it is harder and harder to discern any difference. I feel one of the ways we can expose the true quality of drivers is higher SPL. However, small speakers suffer increasingly in high SPL environments.We already experience this quite a bit. At several recent events we've had to "dial back" small speakers from distortion at higher SPLs. This doesn't help anyone, and prevents the designer from really showing off the design in any valid capacity (IMO).
So if we can't maintain a given SPL for all designs, the intent being to level and playing field because louder sounds better by nature, what if we did categories? Designers themselves can choose the category of their speaker, and we can set an SPL for each that will be challenging enough to reveal driver differences without over-driving the parts. I think this is a great solution and want your feedback. Is this bad? If not, how many categories, 2? 3? We can talk specific SPL later.
Obviously I'd group all category entries to play back to back. All "compact" first, all "standard" next.
Thoughts?
= Howard Stark: "This is the key to the future. I'm limited by the technology of my time, but one day you'll figure this out."
Comments
I also think the smaller differences between speakers have more to do with design choices (crossover & cabinet) than the drivers themselves. I was really surprised at how well Bill's 40 year old large Advents sounded.
Categories is a good idea but you are going down the path of comparing speakers head to head.
Maybe you want to come to grips about comparing/ judging speakers first.
Spitballing...
One category could be "comparing" with only the house track and speakers back to back.
One category not comparing with only the designer's track
I'm with John on this one. It almost seems when you start to segregate like this that more comparison will happen, and a competition style will take the reigns ensuing.
I'm also with Ed- louder is not good for those critically listening all day long. It makes the end of the day a wash in terms of comparison, whether you're keeping track or not. Not to make comparisons to other events, but at MWAF, I believe 75-80dB is the range measured where the judges sit, and that's about 10' or so. The old format of the Iowa event allowed the exhibitor to adjust the level of his own tracks after the house portion had played. (Caveat- this can lead to Pete moshing by himself, and Paul K. holding his head down with his fingers in his ears if Paul Carmody gets ahold of some Deftones tracks.) This gives the designer a chance to show off a smidge if deemed required.
I haven't been since 2010, but I still think about going.
InDIYana Event Website
Have a track or three intended just for the big guys. A nice orchestral track with a big crescendo, some thumping electronica, and a boisterous rock piece just to see what the capabilities of the larger designs have to contribute.
I only turn up my speakers about 10% of the time. Most of the time, I listen at very sane levels that allow me to go for hours at a time. But on occasion, I literally want to feel the music, but I can only do that for about 10 minutes before I have to leave the room, turn everything off, and recover for about 20 minutes.
Reasons to consider moving:
~Less expense to rent the facility,
~Smaller hall means we don't 'lose' the smaller speakers in the room,
~A more 'homey' feel to the event, and
~a more true-to-real-life listening experience
If you really want to start a conversation, how about a separate event for smaller driver design (say 4.5" and under) at the hotel?
Please remember I am not advocating for these changes, just offering them for conversations sake.
In the words of Linda Richman 'Discuss amongst yourselves...'
How about last year's venue, I think it was smaller and still good acoustically?
But however big the room, Kenny's travel sized speakers have not once given up the ghost, something to be said about small speakers.
That's a good question. Since Doug used to take care of that, I have no idea what anything costs other than what we paid for the Harris Center last weekend. We certainly can explore using the JRC space again.
0"-4", 5"-7", 8"- up.
https://www.jfcomponents.com/
I'm familiar with the Harris Center, but practice rooms are used for musical students. There maybe an adequate size room for an event.
What about the small room across the hall at the JRC center, where Greg demo'd his floor standing DSP speakers? That was large enough for about 40 visitors.